Life Annuity Insurance Versus Self‐Annuitization: An Analysis From the Perspective of the Family
Hato Schmeiser and
Thomas Post
Risk Management and Insurance Review, 2005, vol. 8, issue 2, 239-255
Abstract:
When comparing investment in an immediate life annuity with a payout‐equivalent investment fund decumulation plan (self‐annuitization), previous research focused on shortfall probabilities of self‐annuitization. Chances of self‐annuitization (i.e., bequests) typically have not been addressed. We argue that heirs might be willing to bear the shortfall risk of the retiree's self‐annuitization since they might benefit from a bequest. Our article proposes a “family strategy” in which heirs receive the remaining investment fund on the retiree's death, but are obliged to finance the retiree if the fund becomes exhausted. We estimate the chance and risk profile of this “family strategy” from the heirs' perspective using German capital and annuity market data. We show that in many cases, our “family strategy” offers enormous chance potential with low shortfall risk. Finally, we discuss some limitations of the proposed “family strategy” when putting the concept into practice.
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2005.00058.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:8:y:2005:i:2:p:239-255
Access Statistics for this article
Risk Management and Insurance Review is currently edited by Mary A. Weiss
More articles in Risk Management and Insurance Review from American Risk and Insurance Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery (contentdelivery@wiley.com).