Direct and Indirect Causal Effects via Potential Outcomes*

Donald B. Rubin

Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2004, vol. 31, issue 2, 161-170

Abstract: Abstract. The use of the concept of ‘direct’ versus ‘indirect’ causal effects is common, not only in statistics but also in many areas of social and economic sciences. The related terms of ‘biomarkers’ and ‘surrogates’ are common in pharmacological and biomedical sciences. Sometimes this concept is represented by graphical displays of various kinds. The view here is that there is a great deal of imprecise discussion surrounding this topic and, moreover, that the most straightforward way to clarify the situation is by using potential outcomes to define causal effects. In particular, I suggest that the use of principal stratification is key to understanding the meaning of direct and indirect causal effects. A current study of anthrax vaccine will be used to illustrate ideas.

Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9469.2004.02-123.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:31:y:2004:i:2:p:161-170

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0303-6898

Access Statistics for this article

Scandinavian Journal of Statistics is currently edited by ÿrnulf Borgan and Bo Lindqvist

More articles in Scandinavian Journal of Statistics from Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics, Finnish Statistical Society, Norwegian Statistical Association, Swedish Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().