Why do statistics journals have low impact factors?

Erjen Van Nierop

Statistica Neerlandica, 2009, vol. 63, issue 1, 52-62

Abstract: In this paper, we answer the question why statistics journals get lower impact factors than journals in other disciplines. We analyze diffusion patterns of papers in several journals in various academic fields. To obtain insights into the diffusion of the citation counts of the papers, the data are analysed with the Bass model, leading to values for the time‐to‐peak that can be used to compare the speeds of diffusion paper citations of the different disciplines. Estimation results show that for statistics journals, it takes significantly more years to reach their peak. To further investigate diffusion, we also compute the percentages of the total number of citations a paper has after 2 or 3 years. Again, it appears that statistics journals have slower citation diffusion than journals in other disciplines. We conclude with some suggestions to reduce this disparity.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2008.00408.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:stanee:v:63:y:2009:i:1:p:52-62

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0039-0402

Access Statistics for this article

Statistica Neerlandica is currently edited by Miroslav Ristic, Marijtje van Duijn and Nan van Geloven

More articles in Statistica Neerlandica from Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().