The Gender-bias Effect of Test Scoring and Framing: A Concern for Personnel Selection and College Admission

Maria Paz Espinosa and Javier Gardeazabal

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2020, vol. 20, issue 3, 23

Abstract: This paper analyzes gender differences in student performance in Multiple-Choice Tests (MCT). We report evidence from a field experiment suggesting that, when MCT use a correction for guessing formula to obtain test scores, on average women tend to omit more items, get less correct answers and lower grades than men. We find that the gender difference in average test scores is concentrated at the upper tail of the distribution of scores. In addition, gender differences strongly depend on the framing of the scoring rule.

Keywords: gender differences; discrimination; multiple choice tests; correction for guessing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2019-0316 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
Journal Article: The Gender-bias Effect of Test Scoring and Framing: A Concern for Personnel Selection and College Admission (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:20:y:2020:i:3:p:23:n:7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/bejeap/html

DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2019-0316

Access Statistics for this article

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy is currently edited by Hendrik Jürges and Sandra Ludwig

More articles in The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().