Testing for the Unconfoundedness Assumption Using an Instrumental Assumption
Xavier de Luna () and
Per Johansson
Additional contact information
Xavier de Luna: Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business and Economics, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden
Journal of Causal Inference, 2014, vol. 2, issue 2, 187-199
Abstract:
The identification of average causal effects of a treatment in observational studies is typically based either on the unconfoundedness assumption (exogeneity of the treatment) or on the availability of an instrument. When available, instruments may also be used to test for the unconfoundedness assumption. In this paper, we present a set of assumptions on an instrumental variable which allows us to test for the unconfoundedness assumption, although they do not necessarily yield nonparametric identification of an average causal effect. We propose a test for the unconfoundedness assumption based on the instrumental assumptions introduced and give conditions under which the test has power. We perform a simulation study and apply the results to a case study where the interest lies in evaluating the effect of job practice on employment.
Keywords: average treatment effect; job practice; nonparametric identification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2013-0011 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:causin:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:13:n:2
DOI: 10.1515/jci-2013-0011
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Causal Inference is currently edited by Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian and Iván Díaz
More articles in Journal of Causal Inference from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().