Identification of the Joint Effect of a Dynamic Treatment Intervention and a Stochastic Monitoring Intervention Under the No Direct Effect Assumption

Neugebauer Romain (), Schmittdiel Julie A., Adams Alyce S., Grant Richard W. and J. van der Laan Mark
Additional contact information
Neugebauer Romain: Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
Schmittdiel Julie A.: Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
Adams Alyce S.: Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
Grant Richard W.: Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
J. van der Laan Mark: Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

Journal of Causal Inference, 2017, vol. 5, issue 1, 44

Abstract: The management of chronic conditions is characterized by frequent re-assessment of therapy decisions in response to the patient’s changing condition over the course of the illness. Evidence most suitable to inform care thus often concerns the contrast of adaptive treatment strategies that repeatedly personalize treatment decisions over time using the latest accumulated data available from the patient’s previous clinic visits such as laboratory exams (e.g., hemoglobin A1c measurements in diabetes care). The frequency at which such information is monitored implicitly defines the causal estimand that is typically evaluated in an observational or randomized study of such adaptive treatment strategies. Analytic control of monitoring with standard estimation approaches for time-varying interventions can therefore not only improve study generalizibility but also inform the optimal timing of clinical surveillance. Valid inference with these estimators requires the upholding of a positivity assumption that can hinder their applicability. To potentially weaken this requirement for monitoring control, we introduce identifiability results that will facilitate the derivation of alternate estimators of effects defined by general joint treatment and monitoring interventions in the context of time-to-event outcomes. These results are developed based on the nonparametric structural equation modeling framework using a no direct effect assumption originally introduced in a prior paper that inspired this work. The relevance and scope of the results presented here are illustrated with examples in diabetes comparative effectiveness research.

Keywords: counterfactual identifiability; dynamic intervention; effect of monitoring; no direct effect assumption; stochastic intervention; time-varying treatment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2016-0015 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:causin:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:44:n:5

DOI: 10.1515/jci-2016-0015

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Causal Inference is currently edited by Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian and Iván Díaz

More articles in Journal of Causal Inference from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().