The Methodology of Officially Recognized International Sports Rating Systems

Stefani Ray
Additional contact information
Stefani Ray: California State University, Long Beach

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2011, vol. 7, issue 4, 22

Abstract: A comprehensive comparative survey is presented, covering official rating systems as published by internationally recognized sports federations. Mind sports and physical sports are both included. As of November 2010, competitions in 159 international sports are organized by sports federations recognized by the IOC, Sport Accord and by Wikipedia identified under "List of International Sport Federations." Of the 159 sports, 18 are combat sports in which opponents are in direct physical contact as in boxing and wrestling, 74 are independent sports in which significant contact is not allowed as in swimming and archery and 67 are object sports in which indirect contact is allowed while opponents attempt to control an object as in basketball and chess. Of the 159 sports, 60 sports have no rating system, two combat sports have a subjective rating system, 84 sports have an accumulative system in which points accrue non-decreasingly over some window of time, and 13 sports have an adjustive system in which a rating self adjusts based on the difference between some observed result and a prediction of that result based on past performance. For accumulative rating systems, features include converting results to points, ageing results more than one year old, and possibly adjusting points using other performance measures. Such systems are favored by tournament organizers who want to encourage many top competitors to enter as for skiing and tennis. The adjustive systems include Elo, probit and averaging methods. These systems are favored for their technical sophistication by sports such as chess, draughts, go, cricket, and women's soccer. This study thus identifies the observed successful methodology used by the various sports federations to publish comparative ratings. Predictive success of certain rating systems are tabulated for FIBA world championship basketball, Grand Slam tennis and FIFA men's world cup soccer.

Keywords: sports; rating systems; Olympics; international sports federations; Elo; probit; predictions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1347 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:7:y:2011:i:4:n:10

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jqas/html

DOI: 10.2202/1559-0410.1347

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports is currently edited by Mark Glickman

More articles in Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().