Multiple Testing. Part I. Single-Step Procedures for Control of General Type I Error Rates

Dudoit Sandrine, J. van der Laan Mark and Pollard Katherine S.
Additional contact information
Dudoit Sandrine: Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
J. van der Laan Mark: Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
Pollard Katherine S.: University of California, Santa Cruz

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2004, vol. 3, issue 1, 71

Abstract: The present article proposes general single-step multiple testing procedures for controlling Type I error rates defined as arbitrary parameters of the distribution of the number of Type I errors, such as the generalized family-wise error rate. A key feature of our approach is the test statistics null distribution (rather than data generating null distribution) used to derive cut-offs (i.e., rejection regions) for these test statistics and the resulting adjusted p-values. For general null hypotheses, corresponding to submodels for the data generating distribution, we identify an asymptotic domination condition for a null distribution under which single-step common-quantile and common-cut-off procedures asymptotically control the Type I error rate, for arbitrary data generating distributions, without the need for conditions such as subset pivotality. Inspired by this general characterization of a null distribution, we then propose as an explicit null distribution the asymptotic distribution of the vector of null value shifted and scaled test statistics. In the special case of family-wise error rate (FWER) control, our method yields the single-step minP and maxT procedures, based on minima of unadjusted p-values and maxima of test statistics, respectively, with the important distinction in the choice of null distribution. Single-step procedures based on consistent estimators of the null distribution are shown to also provide asymptotic control of the Type I error rate. A general bootstrap algorithm is supplied to conveniently obtain consistent estimators of the null distribution. The special cases of t- and F-statistics are discussed in detail. The companion articles focus on step-down multiple testing procedures for control of the FWER (van der Laan et al., 2004b) and on augmentations of FWER-controlling methods to control error rates such as tail probabilities for the number of false positives and for the proportion of false positives among the rejected hypotheses (van der Laan et al., 2004a). The proposed bootstrap multiple testing procedures are evaluated by a simulation study and applied to genomic data in the fourth article of the series (Pollard et al., 2004).

Keywords: Adjusted p-value; asymptotic control; bootstrap; consistency; cut-off; F-statistic; generalized family-wise error rate; multiple testing; null distribution; null hypothesis; quantile; single-step; test statistic; t-statistic; Type I error rate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1040 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:3:y:2004:i:1:n:13

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/sagmb/html

DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1040

Access Statistics for this article

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology is currently edited by Michael P. H. Stumpf

More articles in Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().