Keeping Up With the Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context

Gundi Knies, Simon Burgess (simon.burgess@bristol.ac.uk) and Carol Propper

The Centre for Market and Public Organisation from The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK

Abstract: We test empirically whether people’s life satisfaction depends on their relative income position in the neighbourhood, drawing on a unique dataset, the German Socio-economic Panel Study (SOEP) matched with micro-marketing indicators of population characteristics. Relative deprivation theory suggests that individuals are happier the better their relative income position in the neighbourhood is. To test this theory we estimate micro-economic happiness models for the years 1994 and 1999 with controls for own income and for neighbourhood income at the zip-code level (roughly 9,000 people). There exist no negative and no statistically significant associations between neighbourhood income and life satisfaction, which refutes relative deprivation theory. If anything, we find positive associations between neighbourhood income and happiness in all cross-sectional models and this is robust to a number of robustness tests, including adding in more controls for neighbourhood quality, changing the outcome variable, and interacting neighbourhood income with indicators that proxy the extent to which individuals may be assumed to interact with their neighbours. We argue that the scale at which we measure neighbourhood characteristics may be too large still to identify the comparison effect sought after.

Keywords: Life satisfaction; Neighbourhood effects; Comparison income; Reference group (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C23 I31 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 19 pages
Date: 2007-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hap, nep-soc and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/CMPO/workingpapers/wp173.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/CMPO/workingpapers/wp173.pdf [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/CMPO/workingpapers/wp173.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.bristol.ac.uk/Depts/CMPO/workingpapers/wp173.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/publications/papers/2007/wp173.pdf [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/publications/papers/2007/wp173.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Keeping up with the Schmidt`s – An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context (2008)
Working Paper: Keeping up with the Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context (2007)
Working Paper: Keeping up with the Schmidts: An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context (2007)
Working Paper: Keeping up with the Schmidts: an empirical test of relative deprivation theory in the neighbourhood context (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bri:cmpowp:07/173

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in The Centre for Market and Public Organisation from The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (cmpo-admin@bristol.ac.uk).