“Powered to Detect Small Effect Sizes”: You keep saying that. I do not think it means what you think it means

Michael Sanders () and Aisling Ní Chonaire

The Centre for Market and Public Organisation from The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK

Abstract: Randomised trials in education research are a valuable and increasingly common part of the research landscape. Choosing a sample size large enough to detect an effect but small enough to make the trial workable is a vital component. In the absence of a crystal ball, rules of thumb are often relied upon. In this paper, we offer criticism for commonly used rules of thumb and show that effect sizes that can be realistically expected in education research are much more modest than studies are powered to detect. This has important implications for future trials, which should arguably be larger, and for the interpretation of prior, underpowered research.

Pages: 18 pages
Date: 2015-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmpo/ ... 5337_Web_Version.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bri:cmpowp:15/337

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in The Centre for Market and Public Organisation from The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().