EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Towards a Plurality of Methods in Project Evaluation: A Contextualised Approach to Understanding Impact Trajectories and Efficacy

Michael Woolcock

Global Development Institute Working Paper Series from GDI, The University of Manchester

Abstract: Understanding the efficacy of development projects requires not only a plausible counterfactual, but an appropriate match between the shape of impact trajectory over time and the deployment of a corresponding array of research tools capable of empirically discerning such a trajectory. At present, however, the development community knows very little, other than by implicit assumption, about the expected shape of the impact trajectory from any given sector or project type, and as such is prone to routinely making attribution errors. Randomisation per se does not solve this problem. The sources and manifestations of these problems are considered, along with some constructive suggestions for responding to them.

Date: 2009
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/gdi/pu ... wpi/bwpi-wp-7309.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Toward a plurality of methods in project evaluation: a contextualised approach to understanding impact trajectories and efficacy (2009) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bwp:bwppap:7309

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Global Development Institute Working Paper Series from GDI, The University of Manchester Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rowena Harding (gdi@manchester.ac.uk).

 
Page updated 2025-02-14
Handle: RePEc:bwp:bwppap:7309