Évaluer et mesurer l'impact de la microfinance: sortir de la « double impasse »

François Doligez, Florent Bédécarrats, Emmanuelle Bouquet, Cécile Lapenu and Betty Wampfler

Revue Tiers-Monde, 2013, vol. n°213, issue 1, 161-178

Abstract: After a historical presentation of impact evaluation methodologies, the contribution presents the ?double deadlock? of quantitative and qualitative approaches in this matter. The analysis then discusses hypotheses that combine these two methodologies with the aim of designing impact evaluation methodologies better suited to the complexity of the sector.

Keywords: Microfinance; evaluation; impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RTM_213_0161 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-tiers-monde-2013-1-page-161.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
Working Paper: Évaluer et mesurer l'impact de la microfinance: sortir de la « double impasse » (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:rtmarc:rtm_213_0161

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revue Tiers-Monde from Armand Colin
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().