Networks and Misallocation: Insurance, Migration, and the Rural-Urban Wage Gap

Kaivan Munshi and Mark Rosenzweig

Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge

Abstract: We provide an explanation for the large spatial wage disparities and low male migration in India based on the trade-off between consumption-smoothing, provided bycaste-based rural insurance networks, and the income-gains from migration. Our theory generates two key empirically-verified predictions: (i) males in relatively wealthy households within a caste who benefit less from the redistributive (surplus-maximizing)network will be more likely to migrate, and (ii) males in households facing greater rural income-risk (who benefit more from the insurance network) migrate less. Structural estimates show that small improvements in formal insurance decrease the spatial misallocation of labor by substantially increasing migration.

Date: 2015-10-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ias, nep-mig and nep-ure
Note: km619
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/pub ... pe-pdfs/cwpe1562.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Networks and Misallocation: Insurance, Migration, and the Rural-Urban Wage Gap (2016)
Working Paper: Networks and Misallocation: Insurance, Migration, and the Rural-Urban Wage Gap (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cam:camdae:1562

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake Dyer ().