Auditing the Auditors: An evaluation of the REF2021 Output Results

Oliver Linton and Emily Xu

Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge

Abstract: We apply the Hole algorithm to evaluate the REF2021 output quality exercise. We find that the implied journal ranking agrees quite closely with the ABS-SCOB journal ranking, and in particular the GPA's agree with a 91% correlation.

Keywords: Journal quality; Ranking; Research funding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-11-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sog
Note: obl20
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/pub ... pe-pdfs/cwpe2266.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: Auditing the Auditors: An evaluation of the REF2021 Output Results (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cam:camdae:2266

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake Dyer ().