Investigating the Fiduciary using Social Positioning Theory: An In-depth Analysis
Helen Mussell
Working Papers from Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
Abstract:
The legal concept of the fiduciary is used extensively in both financial and non-financial organisational contexts. It refers to the situation where one party – the Trustee – is entrusted with serving the best interests of another party – the beneficiary. Because of its wide-ranging use, studies of this concept feature in diverse literature, including legal studies, finance, business ethics, healthcare ethics, and social care. This paper delivers a novel analysis of this concept using social ontological theory – specifically Tony Lawson’s social positioning theory (SPT) – to examine the organisational structure and power embedded in fiduciary relations. It does so for two reasons. Firstly, by theorising the fiduciary from a social ontological perspective we can better understand its structure, the effect of structure on agency, how and why it has evolved, and be clearer on potential for future development. Secondly, equipped with this social ontological analysis, we can explain identified contemporary phenomena which seemingly challenges and contests the power relations embedded in the fiduciary’s organisational structure within the context of financial fiduciary relations. The paper concludes by drawing on the emancipatory potential of SPT as outlined by Lawson, but by applying this potential to considering how financial fiduciary relations can be developed in light of the findings of the SPT analysis.
Keywords: Fiduciary duty; economic agency; trustee; beneficiary; history of finance; share-holder activism; fiduciary activism; contract law; Ethics of Care; Power; Rights and obligations; Trust; Social Ontology; Social positioning theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A12 D02 G11 G30 G32 K12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme and nep-pke
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cbrwp536.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp536
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ruth Newman ().