Evaluating the Returns to Funding Different Measures of Student Disadvantage: Evidence From New Zealand

Jeremy Clark and Susmita Roy Das ()
Additional contact information
Susmita Roy Das: University of Canterbury, https://www.canterbury.ac.nz

Working Papers in Economics from University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance

Abstract: Much of the education finance literature is concerned with evaluating policies that seek to lessen the effect of economic disparities outside schools on the disparity of student outcomes within them. Examples include school finance reform to reduce schools’ reliance on local wealth, special education funding for students with physical or learning disabilities, and affirmative action admissions and support. A national funding programme used in New Zealand for all elementary and high schools provides a rare opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of targeting alternative measures of socio-economic disadvantage. New Zealand targets five deprivation factors of the immediate neighbourhoods in which a school’s students live: low household income, lack of educational qualifications, employment in low skill occupations, household crowding, and the proportion receiving welfare. We use school fixed effects regressions to evaluate whether some disadvantage factors are more effective in raising achievement than others, and secondarily whether other measurable factors such as family structure, health or ethnicity retain strong negative covariance with achievement rates. We find that the marginal effectiveness of targeting “low skill occupation” is comparatively high, and of targeting “receiving welfare” is comparatively low, such that New Zealand would raise achievement rates if it raised the weight on the former and lowered it on the latter. In addition to the five disadvantage factors used, we find that single parent status, rural/urban status, and home ownership co-vary significantly with achievement rates.

Keywords: education funding; socio-economic disadvantage; decile funding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H52 I22 I24 I28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2015-05-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.canterbury.ac.nz/cbt/econwp/1510.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbt:econwp:15/10

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers in Economics from University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Albert Yee ().