The Paradox of the Exclusion of Exploitative Abuse

Bruce Lyons ()
Additional contact information
Bruce Lyons: School of Economics and Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia

No 08-1, Working Papers from Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia

Abstract: Monopoly pricing is a textbook market failure that is taught in the first year of any economics course. The implied welfare loss (or ‘exploitative abuse’) justifies a whole range of competition policy towards cartels, mergers and regulated industries. Yet there is widespread hostility to prosecuting the same exploitative abuse in the textbook monopoly case (i.e. under Article 82EC)! This paper seeks to understand this paradox. I conclude that, while there are important problems with prosecuting Article 82 exploitation cases (because of problems relating to measurement, market dynamics, multi-sided markets and remedy issues), it is important to keep open the possibility of prosecution; for example, in the forthcoming Article 82 Guidelines.

Keywords: exclusionary abuse; exploitative abuse; monopoly pricing; welfare loss (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D42 I38 L41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20 pages
Date: 2007-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-mic and nep-reg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-1.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cheryl Whittkaer ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).