'Consumer Welfare' and Article 82EC: Practice and Rhetoric

Pinar Pinar ()
Additional contact information
Pinar Pinar: Centre for Competition Policy and Norwich Law School, University of East Anglia

No 08-25, Working Papers from Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia

Abstract: This paper questions whether the objective of Article 82EC is indeed enhancing ‘consumer welfare’ as suggested by the EC Commission when one examines the application of the provision thus far. It critically analyses the case law of the EC Commission and Courts to show that there is great dissonance between the practice and the policy declarations on the provision. When one considers the practice alongside the rhetoric, Article 82EC appears as a provision enforced without a clear standard of harm leading to doubts about the legitimacy of enforcement. The article suggests that without a properly defined standard applied in actual decisions by the EC Commission and upheld by the EC Courts, the modernisation of Article 82EC cannot succeed.

Keywords: Article 82EC; consumer welfare; restriction of competition; abuse of a dominant position; enforcement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K21 P46 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 26 pages
Date: 2008-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-law and nep-reg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-25.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-25

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cheryl Whittkaer ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).