Filtered belief revision and generalized choice structures
Giacomo Bonanno ()
No 338, Working Papers from University of California, Davis, Department of Economics
Abstract:
In an earlier paper [Rational choice and AGM belief revision, Artificial Intelligence, 2009] a correspondence was established between the choice structures of revealed-preference theory (developed in economics) and the syntactic belief revision functions of the AGM theory (developed in philosophy and computer science). In this paper we extend the re-interpretation of (a generalized notion of) choice structure in terms of belief revision by adding: (1) the possibility that an item of ``information'' might be discarded as not credible (thus dropping the AGM success axiom) and (2) the possibility that an item of information, while not accepted as fully credible, may still be ``taken seriously'' (we call such items of information ``allowable''). We establish a correspondence between generalized choice structures (GCS) and AGM belief revision; furthermore, we provide a syntactic characterization of the proposed notion of belief revision, which we call filtered belief revision.
Keywords: credible information; allowable information; AGM belief revision; choice structure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D80 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 29
Date: 2020-02-26
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe and nep-ore
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.dss.ucdavis.edu/files/RmbxKkwKdJaYxczQGuCteZbc/CABR.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cda:wpaper:338
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of California, Davis, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Letters and Science IT Services Unit ().