Cyclical Worker Flows: Cleansing vs. Sullying

John Haltiwanger, Henry Hyatt, Erika McEntarfer and Matthew Staiger

Working Papers from U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies

Abstract: Do recessions speed up or impede productivity-enhancing reallocation? To investigate this question, we use U.S. linked employer-employee data to examine how worker flows contribute to productivity growth over the business cycle. We find that in expansions high-productivity firms grow faster primarily by hiring workers away from lower-productivity firms. The rate at which job-to-job flows move workers up the productivity ladder is highly procyclical. Productivity growth slows during recessions when this job ladder collapses. In contrast, flows into nonemployment from low productivity firms disproportionately increase in recessions, which leads to an increase in productivity growth. We thus find evidence of both sullying and cleansing effects of recessions, but the timing of these effects differs. The cleansing effect dominates early in downturns but the sullying effect lingers well into the economic recovery.

Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2021-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eff
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www2.census.gov/ces/wp/2021/CES-WP-21-10.pdf First version, 2021 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Cyclical Worker Flows: Cleansing vs. Sullying (2025)
Working Paper: Cyclical Worker Flows: Cleansing vs. Sullying (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cen:wpaper:21-10

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dawn Anderson ().