General or Central Government? Empirical Evidence on Political Cycles in Budget Composition Using New Data for OECD Countries
Niklas Potrafke
No 8134, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo
Abstract:
Previous studies used general government data to examine whether national governments’ electoral motives and ideology influenced budget composition in OECD countries. General government data includes, however, the state and local level. Using new data for general and central government over the period 1995-2016, I reexamine political cycles in budget composition. The results suggest that, both at the general and central government level, leftwing governments spent more on education and less on public services than rightwing governments. Defense expenditure was somewhat lower under leftwing than rightwing governments and in election years; especially in federal states. Effects of government ideology on the individual expenditure categories are larger at the central than general government level. Scholars need to re-examine results on ideology-induced effects that have been derived from general government data where central government data should have been used.
Keywords: general and central government; budget composition; partisan politics; government ideology; electoral cycles; OECD countries; panel data models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C23 D72 D78 E60 H30 H50 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp8134.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: General or central government? Empirical evidence on political cycles in budget composition using new data for OECD countries (2020) 
Working Paper: General or Central Government? Empirical Evidence on Political Cycles in Budget Composition Using New Data for OECD Countries (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8134
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().