The Gender Pay Gap Revisited with Big Data: Do Methodological Choices Matter?
Anthony Strittmatter and
Conny Wunsch
No 8912, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo
Abstract:
The vast majority of existing studies that estimate the average unexplained gender pay gap use unnecessarily restrictive linear versions of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition. Using a notably rich and large data set of 1.7 million employees in Switzerland, we investigate how the methodological improvements made possible by such big data affect estimates of the unexplained gender pay gap. We study the sensitivity of the estimates with regard to i) the availability of observationally comparable men and women, ii) model flexibility when controlling for wage determinants, and iii) the choice of different parametric and semi-parametric estimators, including variants that make use of machine learning methods. We find that these three factors matter greatly. Blinder-Oaxaca estimates of the unexplained gender pay gap decline by up to 39% when we enforce comparability between men and women and use a more flexible specification of the wage equation. Semi-parametric matching yields estimates that when compared with the Blinder-Oaxaca estimates, are up to 50% smaller and also less sensitive to the way wage determinants are included.
Keywords: gender inequality; gender pay gap; common support; model specification; matching estimator; machine learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big, nep-cmp and nep-lma
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp8912.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: The Gender Pay Gap Revisited with Big Data: Do Methodological Choices Matter? (2021) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a99/a2a99334441876f0a1fb68370294e15c57cd9b04" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: The Gender Pay Gap Revisited with Big Data: Do Methodological Choices Matter? (2021) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a99/a2a99334441876f0a1fb68370294e15c57cd9b04" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: The Gender Pay Gap Revisited with Big Data: Do Methodological Choices Matter? (2021) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a99/a2a99334441876f0a1fb68370294e15c57cd9b04" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: The Gender Pay Gap Revisited with Big Data: Do Methodological Choices Matter? (2021) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a99/a2a99334441876f0a1fb68370294e15c57cd9b04" alt="Downloads"
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8912
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe (wohlrabe@ifo.de).