EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Double-Standards, Debt Treatment, and World Bank Country Classification: The Case of Nigeria-Revised November 2004

Todd Moss (), Scott Standley and Nancy Birdsall

No 45, Working Papers from Center for Global Development

Abstract: Nigeria is currently classified by the World Bank as a ‘blend’ country, making it the poorest country in the world that does not have ‘IDA-only’ status. This paper uses the World Bank’s own IDA eligibility criteria to assess whether Nigeria has a case for reclassification. Given that the country has not borrowed from IBRD for the past eleven years, such a change would merely recognize what is already de facto the case. Based on our analysis, Nigeria clearly qualifies as IDA-only based on its low income level and lack of creditworthiness. Its record of policy performance appears to be the final barrier, but we show it is no worse on performance than three African comparator groups: the current IDA-only pool, previous reverse-graduates, and the IDA-only oil producers. We also question the logic of this criterion for IDA-only ‘eligibility’ (though not of course for actual allocation or disbursements). Certainly, Africa’s three previous reverse-graduates and Angola’s current IDA-only status suggest that Nigeria is facing a double-standard. We thus conclude that Nigeria does have a strong case for reclassification. Nigeria has good reason to request such a change as it would allow it more equal consideration of its access to IDA grants (restricted to IDA-only countries) including for HIV/AIDS programs and its allocation of IDA loans. Reclassification would also strengthen the case for Nigeria receiving an immediate write-down of a large portion of its debt to bilateral donors (along the lines of concessional Naples terms for IDA-only countries), which we argue is critical to any hope that the current government’s economic and political reform efforts can be sustained. The creditors have good reason for supporting such a change as part of a broader strategy for encouraging progress in Africa’s most populous country, and one that is key to stabilizing a region where internal conflict and Islamic radicalism create threats to global security.

Keywords: Nigeria; debt; World Bank; IDA; poverty; global security (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F33 F34 F35 F51 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2004-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr and nep-dev
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/2741
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/2741 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/2741)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cgd:wpaper:45

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Center for Global Development Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publications Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-03
Handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:45