Costs and Benefits of Rural-Urban Migration: Evidence from India

Clément Imbert and John Papp
Additional contact information
John Papp: R.I.C.E

CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)

Abstract: This paper provides new evidence on rural-urban migration decisions in developing countries. Using original survey data from rural India, we show that seasonal migrants prefer to earn 35 percent less on local public works rather than incur the cost of migrating. Structural estimates suggest that the fixed cost of migration is small, and can be entirely explained by travel costs and income risk. In contrast, the flow cost of migration is very high. We argue that higher living costs in the city explain only a small part of the flow cost of migration, and that most of it is non-monetary.

Keywords: Internal Migration; Workfare Programs; India; Urban; Rural JEL Classification: H53; J22; J61; O15; R23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-dev and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/c ... /459-2020_imbert.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Costs and benefits of rural-urban migration: Evidence from India (2020)
Working Paper: Costs and Benefits of Rural-Urban Migration: Evidence from India (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cge:wacage:459

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jane Snape ().