Calibration of Quantum Decision Theory, Aversion to Large Losses and Predictability of Probabilistic Choices

Sabine Vincent, Tatyana Kovalenko, Vyacheslav I. Yukalov and Didier Sornette
Additional contact information
Sabine Vincent: ETH Zurich
Tatyana Kovalenko: ETH Zurich
Vyacheslav I. Yukalov: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research; D-MTEC, ETH Zurich
Didier Sornette: Swiss Finance Institute; ETH Zürich - Department of Management, Technology, and Economics (D-MTEC)

No 16-31, Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series from Swiss Finance Institute

Abstract: We present the first calibration of quantum decision theory (QDT) to an empirical data set. The data comprise 91 choices between two lotteries (two "prospects") presented in 91 random pairs made by 142 subjects offered at two separated times. First, we quantitatively account for the fraction of choice reversals between the two repetitions of the decisions, using a probabilistic choice formulation in the simplest possible form with no model assumption and no adjustable parameter. The prediction of choice reversal is then refined by introducing heterogeneity between decision makers through a differentiation of the population into two similar sized groups in terms of "over-confident" and "contrarian" decision makers. This supports the first fundamental tenet of QDT, which models the choice of an option as an inherent probabilistic process, such that the probability of a choice can be expressed as the sum of its utility and attraction factors. We propose to model (a) the utility factor with a stochastic version of cumulative prospect theory (logit-CPT), and (b) the attraction factor with a constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) function. This makes logit-CPT nested in our proposed parameterisation of QDT, allowing for a precise quantitative comparison between the two theories. For this data set, the QDT model is found to perform better at both the aggregate and individual levels, and for all considered fit criteria both for the first iteration of the experiment and for predictions (second iteration). The QDT effect associated with the attraction factor is mostly appreciable for prospects with big losses. Our quantitative analysis of the experiment results supports the existence of an intrinsic limit of predictability, which is associated with the inherent probabilistic nature of choice.

Keywords: Quantum decision theory; QDT; prospect probability; utility factor; attraction factor; interference; parametrization; hierarchical estimation method; calibration; empirical data; simple gambles; stochastic Cumulative prospect theory; logit-CPT; probabilistic decision making; limits of predictability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C44 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 45 pages
Date: 2016-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm and nep-upt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2775279 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1631

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series from Swiss Finance Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ridima Mittal ().