Sexism, Statements, and Audits

Eric Schniter () and Timothy Shields ()
Additional contact information
Eric Schniter: The Economic Science Institute, and Argyros School of Business & Economics, Chapman University
Timothy Shields: The Economic Science Institute, and Argyros School of Business & Economics, Chapman University

Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute

Abstract: Gender stereotypes and gender-discriminant behaviors have been shown to have strong and undesirable organizational, managerial, and economic effects. We examine the relationship between sexism and accounting practices, and the effect of contextual feedback using laboratory experiments. Sexist stereotypes and contextual feedback may affect the likelihood of financial misstatements and audits when auditors and issuers are of known gender. To investigate these aspects of sexism at zero acquaintance and after contextual feedback, we presented males and females with incentivized belief elicitation tasks about anticipated interaction behaviors and then a series of strategic-communication game decisions in same, other, and unknown gender interactions. Feedback about belief accuracy, actual behaviors, and earnings was only given after completing a full set of belief elicitations and interactions. At zero acquaintance, both genders stereotyped the other gender’s behavior propensities as relatively different than their own gender’s. Both genders’ stereotyped male and female targets similarly, and while both genders discriminated based on target gender, males’ and females’ behavior was similar. Consistent with a statistical discrimination account of sexism, stereotypes and game behaviors were adjusted after contextual feedback to more accurately reflect and predict others’ behaviors. While biosocial and evolutionary perspectives may help explain why undesirable sexism is prevalent, our results suggest that by providing contextual information and incentives in reporting and auditing settings, we can motivate sexists to moderate their stereotypes and linked behaviors.

Keywords: sexism; gender; stereotype; discrimination; audit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 D03 J14 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 45 pages
Date: 2014
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc and nep-exp
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.chapman.edu/research-and-institutions/e ... lOntogenyTsimane.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chu:wpaper:14-19

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Megan Luetje ().