Trust in Humans and Robots: Economically Similar but Emotionally Different
Timothy Shields,
Eric Schniter and
Daniel Sznycer
Additional contact information
Daniel Sznycer: Department of Psychology, University of Montreal
Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute
Abstract:
Trust-based interactions with robots are increasingly common in the marketplace, workplace, on the road, and in the home. However, a looming concern is that people may not trust robots as they do humans. While trust in fellow humans has been studied extensively, little is known about how people extend trust to robots. Here we compare trust-based investments and emotions from across three nearly identical economic games: human-human trust games, human-robot trust games, and human-robot trust games where the robot decision impacts another human. Robots in our experiment mimic humans: they are programmed to make reciprocity decisions based on previously observed behaviors by humans in analogous situations. We find that people invest similarly in humans and robots. By contrast, the social emotions elicited by the interactions (but not non-social emotions) differed across human and robot trust games, and did so lawfully. Emotional reactions depended on how one’s trust game decision interacted with the partnered agent’s decision, and whether another person was affected economically and emotionally.
Keywords: Trust; Robots; Artificial Intellgience; Emotion; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big, nep-cbe, nep-exp, nep-hpe, nep-hrm, nep-mac and nep-soc
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/282/
Related works:
Journal Article: Trust in humans and robots: Economically similar but emotionally different (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chu:wpaper:18-22
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Megan Luetje ().