BY-EMPLOYMENTS IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE FOR ESTIMATING HISTORICAL MALE OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURES
Sebastian A.J. Keibek ()
Additional contact information
Sebastian A.J. Keibek: The Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure
No 29, Working Papers from Department of Economic and Social History at the University of Cambridge
Abstract:
Based on the evidence from probate inventories, by-employments have generally been presumed ubiquitous amongst early modern Englishmen. This would appear to present a significant problem for estimates of the contemporary male occupational structure, since the sources on which these estimates are based describe men almost always by their principal employment only. This paper argues that this problem is vanishingly small, for three reasons. Firstly, the probate inventory evidence is shown to exaggerate the incidence of by-employments by a factor of two, as a consequence of its inherent wealth bias. Secondly, it is demonstrated that even after wealth-bias correction, the probate record greatly overstates by-employment incidence as most of the traces of subsidiary activities in the inventories actually point to the employments of other members of the household, not to by-employments of the inventoried male household head. Thirdly, even if one ignored this and assumed that they did, in fact, point to his by-employments, they are shown to have been relatively small in economic importance compared to the principal employment, and to necessitate only a very minor adjustment of the principal-employment-only male occupational structure.
Keywords: by-employments; probate inventories; wealth bias; occupational structure; parish registers; women’s work (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-01-15, Revised 2017-03-21
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in Cambridge Working Paper in Economic & Social History, No. 29
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econsoc.hist.cam.ac.uk/docs/CWPESH_number_29_March_2017.pdf None. (application/pdf)
None.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cmh:wpaper:29
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economic and Social History at the University of Cambridge Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Guillaume Proffit () and Alexis Litvine ().