Is work bad for health? The role of constraint vs choice

Andrea Bassanini and Eve Caroli

No 1402, CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) from CEPREMAP

Abstract: This paper reviews the literature on the impact of work on health. We consider work along two dimensions: (i) the intensive margin, i.e. how many hours an individual works and (ii) the extensive margin, i.e. whether an individual is in employment or not, independent of the number of hours worked. We show that most of the evidence on the negative health impact of work found in the literature is based on situations in which workers have essentially no control (no choice) over the amount of work they provide. In essence, what is detrimental to health is not so much work per se as much as the gap which may exist between the actual and the desired amount of work, both at the intensive and extensive margins.

Keywords: health; work; retirement; hours worked; job loss; individual choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28 pages
Date: 2014-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea and nep-lab
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepremap.fr/depot/docweb/docweb1402.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Is work bad for health? The role of constraint vs choice (2017)
Working Paper: Is Work Bad for Health? The Role of Constraint vs Choice (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpm:docweb:1402

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) from CEPREMAP Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mathieu Perona ().