Further Evidence on Performance Evaluation: Portfolio Holdings, Recommendations, and Turnover Costs

Gonzalo Rubio

CEPR Financial Market Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: This paper investigates the performance of mutual funds in Spain between January and June 1990. The robustness of results to alternative measurements and benchmarks is carefully analysed. As expected, the results indicate that, with monthly returns, it is not possible to measure the magnitudes of selectivity and timing. We are only able to measure the magnitude of total performance. The argument is that, from an empirical point of view, if we want to be more precise about the reasons behind performance, portfolio holdings are absolutely necessary. This work employs a new data set used on monthly portfolio holdings of a representative sample of funds. Empirical results distinguishing selectivity and timing are presented. Moreover, a comparison of results using monthly returns and monthly portfolio holdings are also reported. Finally, the impact of turnover costs is considered as an explanation of the results.

Keywords: Portfolio; Risk-Adjusted Return; Timing; Turnover Costs; Mean- Variance Efficiency; Information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprfm:0019

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Financial Market Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().