The Social Security Earnings Test Removal. Money Saved or Money Spent by the Trust Fund?

Giovanni Mastrobuoni ()

No 51, CeRP Working Papers from Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin (Italy)

Abstract: Beneficiaries of Social Security face restrictions on how much they can earn without incurring the earnings test (ET). In 2000, President Clinton eliminated the ET between age 65 and 70. In this paper I evaluate how this removal impacts the long-term finances of the Trust Fund. I find that starting in 2006 the Social Security Administration is actually saving money and that the removal appears to be Pareto-efficient. A removal of the remaining part of the ET is likely to be even less costly and to produce larger increases in labor supply and contributions.

Keywords: Pension; Saving (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 29 pages
Date: 2006-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cerp.carloalberto.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/wp_51.pdf?f6fa34 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Social Security Earnings Test Removal. Money Saved or Money Spent by the Trust Fund? (2006)
Working Paper: The Social Security Earnings Test Removal: Money Saved or Money Spent by the Trust Fund? (2006)
Working Paper: The Social Security Earnings Test Removal: Money Saved or Money Spent by the Trust Fund? (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:crp:wpaper:51

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CeRP Working Papers from Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin (Italy) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Silvia Maero ().