Control Bands for Tracking Constant Portfolio Allocations with Fixed and Proportional Transaction Costs
Yiannis Kamarianakis () and
Anastasios Xepapadeas
No 610, Working Papers from University of Crete, Department of Economics
Abstract:
The vast majority of research related to optimal asset allocation strategies in the presence of transaction costs, requires formulation of highly sophisticated numerical schemes for the estimation of no-transaction bands; moreover, the optimization objectives examined are far less compared to the number of works that assume frictionless trading. In this article, we point out that an investor may alternatively try to track a constant allocation strategy as derived under the frictionless markets hypothesis and any optimization objective, by applying a loss function that reflects his/her risk preferences. We focus in the two-asset case (one riskless and one risky) and assume a fixed cost per transaction plus a cost proportional to the change in the risky fraction process. Using a recently proposed transformation of the risky fraction process by Nagai (2005), we derive optimal rebalancing policies for the quadratic loss case, using two alternative methods. First, we calculate no transaction bands for investors who choose the boundaries of the bands and their optimal rebalancing actions so that they minimize long run cost per unit time. The latter is defined as the expected cost per transaction cycle (opportunity cost/tracking error plus transaction cost) divided by the expected cycle time. In the second case, the objective is to minimize the expected discounted squared tracking error plus discounted transaction costs over an infinite horizon. On that purpose, similar to Suzuki and Pliska (2004), we use impulse control theory in a continuous-time, dynamic setting and characterize the optimal strategy in terms of a quasi-variational inequality. For both formulations, we derive explicit solutions, which we use to perform sensitivity analysis for the control bands with respect to the market parameters and the magnitude of the transaction costs.
Keywords: risky fraction process; stochastic impulse controls; control bands; quasi-variational inequalities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C53 G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2006-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fin and nep-fmk
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://economics.soc.uoc.gr/wpa/docs/workpap.zip First version, 2006 (application/zip)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to economics.soc.uoc.gr:443 (Bad file descriptor) (http://economics.soc.uoc.gr/wpa/docs/workpap.zip [302 Found]--> https://economics.soc.uoc.gr/wpa/docs/workpap.zip)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:crt:wpaper:0610
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Crete, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kostis Pigounakis ().