Removing Barriers to Facilitate Efficient Water Markets in the Murray Darling Basin – A Case Study from Australia

M Ejaz Qureshi, Tian Shi, Sumaira Qureshi, Wendy Proctor (wendy.proctor@gmail.com) and Mac Kirby (ejaz.qureshi@csiro.au)
Additional contact information
Mac Kirby: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Muhammad Ejaz Qureshi (mejaz.qureshi@anu.edu.au)

No 2009-02, Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series from CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

Abstract: Water markets have been seen as an effective way of addressing water scarcity and allocation issues. In this paper we discuss the role and characteristics of water markets in facilitating efficient water allocation. Administrative, regulatory and/or political barriers to effective functioning of water markets are reviewed with a focus on southern Murray-Darling Basin in Australia. A mathematical model is developed to estimate the costs of existing restrictions and the benefits from potential changes in the water markets (eg. removing barriers in temporary water market). The modelling results reveal that when expanding trade from intraregional only to interregional trade, mean annual net returns increased from $2,502 million to $2,590 million (i.e. an increase of $88 million). When the current volume restrictions, exchange rates, and trading charges are in place, mean annual net returns reduced from $2,590 million to $2,573 million (i.e. a reduction of $17 million). The exclusion of any state from the interstate water trading market imposes significant costs. If South Australia, New South Wales or Victoria withdraws from the market, it reduces net returns by $27 million, $31 million and $63 million, respectively, from water trading. In conclusion, the policy implications on strategies to removing market barriers are outlined to facilitate efficient and effective water trading.

Keywords: market barrier; opportunity cost; temporary water market; efficient water market; Australia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q20 Q21 Q25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2009-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.csiro.au/files/files/pnth.pdf First version, 2009 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.csiro.au/files/files/pnth.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.csiro.au/files/files/pnth.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cse:wpaper:2009-02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series from CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CSE-Webrequest (cse.webrequest@csiro.au this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).