A Conceptual Framework for Guiding the Participatory Development of Agricultural Decision Support Systems

Emma Jakku and Peter Thorburn ()
Additional contact information
Peter Thorburn: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Australia

No 2009-12, Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series from CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems

Abstract: Scientists develop decision support systems (DSSs) to make agricultural science more accessible for farmers and extension officers. Despite the growing use of participatory approaches in agricultural DSS development, reflection on this endeavour is largely focused on the ‘doing’ of participation or the ‘problem of implementation’, with little reference to relevant theoretical approaches within the field of science and technology studies (STS). However, if DSS development is to reach its full potential, a more conceptually informed understanding of how stakeholders collaborate in the participatory development of DSSs is required. To contribute to this gap, we developed a conceptual framework based on three concepts drawn from STS that can add value to understanding agricultural DSSs: interpretative flexibility, technological frames, and boundary objects. A DSS becomes a boundary object when it enables the various parties involved in its development to collaborate and learn together despite diverse perceptions of the DSS or the issues that the DSS is being used to address. When combined, these three concepts highlight the importance of social learning for participatory DSS development, particularly the need to begin by exploring the parties’ different perspectives and facilitating co-learning. Our framework leads to a re-definition of success for participatory DSS development, by identifying social learning as a valuable outcome that can occur when farmers, extension officers and scientists collaborate. A case study of stakeholder collaboration to develop an irrigation scheduling DSS for the Australian sugarcane industry is used to illustrate the analytical strength of this conceptual framework.

Keywords: social learning; interpretative flexibility; technological frames; boundary objects; irrigation; climate variability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O32 Q16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2009-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.csiro.au/files/files/ptgm.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.csiro.au/files/files/ptgm.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.csiro.au/files/files/ptgm.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cse:wpaper:2009-12

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series from CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CSE-Webrequest ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).