Technical change and the postwar slowdown in Soviet economic growth

Leonard Kukić

IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH from Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola

Abstract: The existing studies usually find that technical change was very important in constraining the economic growth of the Soviet Union. While these studies have been successful in quantifying the extent of technical change, they have been less successful in quantifying its nature. This paper probes the essence of technical change by analysing its direction and bias. I find that the Soviet Union achieved strong increases in labour efficiency until the 1960s. Although the labour efficiency growth subsequently slowed down, it is capital efficiency that drove the postwar slowdown in economic growth. I argue that labour shortages, combined with an inadequate investment policy, retarded the Soviet capital efficiency.

Keywords: Soviet; Union; Economic; Growth; Technical; Change; Economic; History (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N14 O33 O47 P27 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-09-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis, nep-eff, nep-gro, nep-his, nep-isf and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams ... b56a3dc23c22/content (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cte:whrepe:33259

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH from Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ana Poveda ().