The Disjunction Between Corporate Residence and Corporate Taxation: Is Improvement Possible?

Geoffrey Loomer
Additional contact information
Geoffrey Loomer: Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University; International Research Fellow, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation

Canadian Tax Journal, 2015, vol. 63, issue 1, 91-132

Abstract: In this article, the author analyzes the concept of corporate residence, with particular reference to the law in the United Kingdom and Canada. Accepting that the taxation of corporations has some justification, there is nonetheless a disjunction between meaningful residence-based taxation and current definitions of corporate residence in domestic law and tax treaties. This disjunction occurs because the various legal meanings ascribed to corporate residence require little in the way of economic attachment to the purported home state. The author begins with a brief review of the phenomenon of tax-driven corporate mobility, followed by a summary of government responses to corporate mobility. In the main body of the article, he argues that residence concepts that were originally intended to reflect substantial activities of corporate management were largely eclipsed by legislated incorporation tests in the United Kingdom and Canada, and were otherwise devitalized by judicial interpretations of "central management and control" when applied to multinational enterprises. The author then argues that although the treaty concept of "place of effective management" has promise because it could denote real and substantive management, to date this interpretation has been eschewed by higher courts, at least in the case of corporations. Recent cases on the residence of trusts are noted because they illustrate a contrasting, and perhaps preferable, approach to entity residence. Given that current formulations of corporate residence appear to be deficient, the author makes tentative suggestions regarding how corporate residence definitions could be improved to focus on the objective reality or unreality of corporate establishment.

Keywords: Avoidance; corporations; residence; multinationals; Canada; United Kingdom (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2015CTJ1.aspx (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ctf:journl:v:63:y:2015:i:1:p:91-132

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Canadian Tax Foundation, 145 Wellington Street West, Suite 1400, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 1H8
https://www.ctf.ca/E ... ns_ListingBooks.aspx

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Tax Journal is currently edited by Kim Brooks, Kevin Milligan, and Daniel Sandler

More articles in Canadian Tax Journal from Canadian Tax Foundation Canadian Tax Foundation, 145 Wellington Street West, Suite 1400, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 1H8.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jim Lyons ().