Segregating socioeconomic classes leads to an unequal redistribution of wealth
Riccardo Pansini (),
Marco Campenni and
Lei Shi
Additional contact information
Riccardo Pansini: Kunming Institute of Zoology
Marco Campenni: Yunnan University of Finance and Economics
Lei Shi: Arizona State University
No GRU_2018_017, GRU Working Paper Series from City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics and Finance, Global Research Unit
Abstract:
Social living groups are organised in social hierarchies often exhibiting inequalities in beings. Investigating class segregation and the use of punishment applied downward in the rank acts as a key aspect to ascertain how dominant and subordinate partners cooperate to achieve mutual profit. In human subjects coming from countries with an uneven wealth distribution, this mutual profit may be reduced, especially for the lower socioeconomic classes. We implemented an Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Game experiment in one such country with starkly high inequality, China. We split relatively richer and poorer subjects into separate classes and gave only one the authority to punish the other. When rich subjects could unidirectionally punish poor subjects (as in a segregated society), rich subjects decreased their cooperation effort while punishing poor subjects. When rich and poor subjects, instead, could punish each other in random combinations (as in an integrated society) they decreased defections so they could punish more. In the segregated society model, the punishing classes earned twice as much as the non-punishers. Conversely, in the integrated society model, weak differences in earnings were found, leading to a decrease in inequality. These results were confirmed by an agent-based simulation mirroring the human experiments and repeated during a very large number of rounds. From our research, we conclude that, especially in developing economies, if the states enacted that the dominant and subordinate individuals relinquished their almost segregated state, this would lead to a redistribution of wealth and power.
Keywords: cooperation; punishment; Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game; socioeconomic class segregation; Agent Based Modelling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2018-06-26
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-hme
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Palgrave Communications volume 6, Article number: 46 (2020), available on 20 March 2020.
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cb.cityu.edu.hk/ef/doc/GRU/WPS/GRU%232018-017%20Pansini.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cth:wpaper:gru_2018_017
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GRU Working Paper Series from City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics and Finance, Global Research Unit Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by GRU ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).