Self-reported wellbeing indicators are a valuable complement to traditional economic indicators but aren’t yet ready to compete with them

Dan Benjamin (), Kristen Cooper (), Ori Heffetz () and Miles Kimball
Additional contact information
Dan Benjamin: University of Southern California and NBER
Kristen Cooper: Gordon College
Ori Heffetz: Cornell University

No GRU_2019_029, GRU Working Paper Series from City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics and Finance, Global Research Unit

Abstract: We join the call for governments to routinely collect survey-based measures of self-reported wellbeing and for researchers to study them. We list a number of challenges that have to be overcome in order for these measures to eventually achieve a status competitive with traditional economic indicators. We discuss in more detail one of the challenges, comprehensiveness: single-question wellbeing measures do not seem to fully capture what people care about. We briefly review the existing evidence, suggesting that survey respondents, when asked to make real or hypothetical tradeoffs, would not always choose to maximize their predicted response to single-question wellbeing measures. The deviations appear systematic, and persist under conditions where alternative explanations are less plausible. We also review an approach for combining single-question measures into a more comprehensive wellbeing index—an approach that itself is not free of ongoing theoretical and implementational challenges, but that we view as a promising direction.

Pages: 10 pages
Date: 2019-10-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hap and nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cb.cityu.edu.hk/ef/doc/GRU/WPS/GRU%232019-029%20Benjamin.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Self-reported wellbeing indicators are a valuable complement to traditional economic indicators but are not yet ready to compete with them (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cth:wpaper:gru_2019_029

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GRU Working Paper Series from City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics and Finance, Global Research Unit Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by GRU ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).