On Cobb-Douglas Preferences in Bilateral Oligopoly

Alex Dickinson
Additional contact information
Alex Dickinson: University of Strathclyde

No 2013045, Discussion Papers (REL - Recherches Economiques de Louvain) from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)

Abstract: Bilateral oligopoly is a simple model of exchange in which a finite set of sellers seek to exchange the goods they are endowed with for money with a finite set of buyers, and no price-taking assumptions are imposed. If trade takes place via a strategic market game bilateral oligopoly can be thought of as two linked proportional-sharing contests: in one the sellers share the aggregate bid from the buyers in proportion to their supply and in the other the buyers share the aggregate supply in proportion to their bids. The analysis can be separated into two ‘partial games’. First, fix the aggregate bid at B; in the first partial game the sellers contest this fixed prize in proportion to their supply and the aggregate supply in the equilibrium of this game is X(B) . Next, fix the aggregate supply at X; in the second partial game the buyers contest this fixed prize in proportion to their bids and the aggregate bid in the equilibrium of this game is . The analysis of these two partial games takes into account competition with ~b (X)in each side of the market. Equilibrium in bilateral oligopoly must take into account competition between sellers and buyers and requires, for example, ~B (~x(b)))=B. When all traders have Cobb-Douglas preference~X(B)s does not depend on B ~B (x) and does not depend on X: whilst there is competition within each side of the market there is no strategic interdependence between the sides of the market. The Cobb-Douglas assumption provides a tractable framework in which to explore the features of fully strategic trade but it misses perhaps the most interesting feature of bilateral oligopoly, the implications of which are investigated

Keywords: Strategic market game; Bilateral oligopoly; Cobb-Douglas preferences; Aggregative games (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D43 D50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21
Date: 2013-12-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-gth and nep-mic
Note: Special Issue : Recent Developments in Strategic Interactions and General Equilibrium
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42771215 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ctl:louvre:2013045

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers (REL - Recherches Economiques de Louvain) from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Place Montesquieu 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sebastien SCHILLINGS ().