ROBUST TESTS OF THE UNIT ROOT HYPOTHESIS SHOULD NOT BE “MODIFIED”

Samuel B. Thompson

Econometric Theory, 2004, vol. 20, issue 2, 360-381

Abstract: The rank-based unit root tests proposed by Hasan and Koenker (1997, Econometrica 65, 133–161) have power equal to size for normal innovations. Unit root tests based on M-estimators exhibit the same behavior. The problem occurs because the test statistics are transformed to obtain computationally convenient critical values. I describe a convenient way to compute critical values without transforming the test statistics. The resulting tests are almost as powerful as least squares–based tests for normal errors and much more powerful for thicker tailed distributions.I thank Thomas Rothenberg for many useful comments. This paper is based on my dissertation, which he supervised. I also thank Jack Porter, Jim Powell, Richard Stanton, and Jim Stock for good advice. Comments of Bruce Hansen, the editor, and two anonymous referees improved the exposition.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:etheor:v:20:y:2004:i:02:p:360-381_20

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Econometric Theory from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().