Preferences for redistribution and pensions. What can we learn from experiments?
Franziska Tausch (tausch@coll.mpg.de),
Jan Potters and
Arno Riedl
Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 2013, vol. 12, issue 3, 298-325
Abstract:
Redistribution is an inevitable feature of collective pension schemes and economic experiments have revealed that most people have a preference for redistribution that is not merely inspired by self-interest. However, little is known on how these preferences interact with preferences for different pension schemes. In this paper, we review the experimental evidence on preferences for redistribution and suggest some links to redistribution through pensions. For that purpose we distinguish between three types of situations. The first deals with distributional preferences behind a veil of ignorance. In the second type of situation, individuals make choices in front of the veil of ignorance and know their position. Finally, we discuss situations in which income is determined by interdependent rather than individual choices. In the closing sections of the paper, we discuss whether and how these experimental results speak to the redistribution issues of pensions. For example, do they argue for or against mandatory participation? Should we have less redistribution and more actuarial fairness? How does this depend on the type of redistribution involved?
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: Preferences for redistribution and pensions: what can we learn from experiments? (2011)
Working Paper: Preferences for Redistribution and Pensions. What can we Learn from Experiments? (2010)
Working Paper: Preferences for Redistribution and Pensions: What Can We Learn from Experiments? (2010)
Working Paper: Preferences for redistribution and pensions: what can we learn from experiments? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:12:y:2013:i:03:p:298-325_00
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Pension Economics and Finance from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing (csjnls@cambridge.org).