Economic Writing on the Pressing Problems of the Day: The Roles of Moral Intuition and Methodological Confusion
Julie Nelson
No 09-03, GDAE Working Papers from GDAE, Tufts University
Abstract:
Economists are often called on to help address pressing problems of the day, yet many economists are uncomfortable about disclosing the values that they bring to this work. This essay explores how an inadequate understanding of the role of methodology, as related to ethics and human emotions of concern, underlies this reluctance and compromises the quality of economic advice. The tension between caring about the problems, on the one hand, and writing within the existing culture of the discipline, on the other, are illustrated with examples from U.S. policymaking, behavioral economics, and the economics of climate change and global poverty. Potential steps towards a more responsible, "strongly objective," and policy-useful economics are discussed.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-ene and nep-hpe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/09-03EconWriting.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/09-03EconWriting.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/09-03EconWriting.pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Economic Writing on the Pressing Problems of the Day: The Roles of Moral Intuition and Methodological Confusion (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dae:daepap:09-03
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GDAE Working Papers from GDAE, Tufts University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Abdulshaheed Alqunber ().