Responding to Economic and Ecological Deficits

Jonathan Harris

No 19-01, GDAE Working Papers from GDAE, Tufts University

Abstract: Macroeconomic theory was shaken up in the wake of the financial crisis, with neoclassical approaches proving inadequate to analyze or respond to the need for policy action. Despite efforts to return to more conventional macro perspectives, a continuing re-evaluation of economic theory has important implications both for traditional economic concerns such as employment and inflation, and for ecological issues and the climate crisis. An emerging “green Keynesian†approach combines a radical Keynesian analysis with ecological priorities such as drastic carbon emissions reduction. One important aspect of this reorientation of theory is the analysis of economic and ecological deficits. In the years since the financial crisis, both economic and ecological deficits have increased. This poses a challenge for “green Keynesian†policy. It is therefore necessary to have effective analyses to measure and respond to ecological deficits, as well as policy measures to deal with economic deficits. This paper proposes a new approach to measuring ecological deficits, and a new perspective on economic deficits and debt. Since there is no single unitary measure for depletion or degradation of different kinds of resources, it is necessary to measure different kinds of deficit for different resources, with a goal of reducing all of these to zero or replacing them with surpluses. The analysis involves exploring the specific economic implications of reducing both ecological and economic deficits, which involves re-conceptualizing economic growth and "degrowth", and provides an alternative to current U.S. policies under the Trump administration, which are contributing to widening both deficits.

Date: 2019-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env, nep-hme and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/19-01_Harris_R ... ologicalDeficits.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/19-01_Harris_RespondingtoEconomicEcologicalDeficits.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/19-01_Harris_RespondingtoEconomicEcologicalDeficits.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dae:daepap:19-01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GDAE Working Papers from GDAE, Tufts University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Abdulshaheed Alqunber ().