Left behind single in the partnering market? Entry into cohabiting unions by women and men with low educational attainment across regions of Europe, cohorts 1960 to 1985
Nadia Sturm and
Jan Van Bavel
Additional contact information
Nadia Sturm: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Jan Van Bavel: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Demographic Research, 2024, vol. 51, issue 43, 1371-1410
Abstract:
Background: In recent cohorts, obtaining an advanced educational qualification has become the norm across European countries and women now outnumber men in tertiary education, possibly leading to shifts in men’s preference for equally or higher-educated partners. Women with at most a basic educational qualification might therefore be increasingly marginalized in the partnering market. Objective: We investigate whether women with lower educational qualifications are less likely to ever enter a cohabiting union in different regions of Europe. We analyse whether this association has changed across cohorts and compare it to the results for men. Methods: We apply logistic regressions to recent European Social Survey data from 2002–2022 from 28 countries, grouped into four regions. We include women and men born between 1960 and 1985. Results: In recent cohorts in Western and Southern Europe, compared to higher-educated women the probability of 35 to 45-year-old, lower-educated women having ever entered a cohabiting union has declined significantly. In older cohorts, we find the opposite. Our findings point in a similar direction for the Nordic and Eastern European regions, but the associations remain statistically insignificant. We find that union formation patterns between lower-educated men and women converge in the Western and Southern European regions. Conclusions: Our results suggest that women with lower educational qualifications are becoming increasingly marginalized in the partnering market. Contribution: We add to the limited cross-country research on the educational gradient of women entering a cohabiting union and on convergence between men and women in union formation patterns.
Keywords: union formation; cohabitation; marginalization; partner selection; education; event history analysis; logistic regression; singlehood; Europe; European Social Survey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol51/43/51-43.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:43
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.51.43
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Demographic Research from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office (office@demographic-research.org).