Maximizing Benefits for Women: A Charitable Donation Allocation Problem

Jenna Toussaint (), Shang Wu () and Kent Messer ()
Additional contact information
Jenna Toussaint: Department of Economics, University of Delaware
Shang Wu: Department of Applied Economics & Statistics, University of Delaware

No 12-12, Working Papers from University of Delaware, Department of Economics

Abstract: Charitable foundations should endeavor to allocate their limited resources to best serve their constituents. However, few foundations use mathematical programming techniques despite overwhelming evidence of their superiority at selecting projects that yield higher levels of total benefits. The Fund for Women, a Delaware foundation that makes grants to programs serving women, is a notable exception to this pattern as they have begun using a novel “Hybrid Selection Model” that combines both binary linear programming and the heuristic rank-based model. Using data from the foundation, this study shows how the rank-based selection model that was previously used by this group, and currently in use by most foundations, yields lower levels of aggregate benefits compared to binary linear programming or goal programming. Using historical data from 2010, this research shows that a Hybrid model would have selected the top three ‘signature’ projects can maintain an above average project benefits while also securing a 180% improvement in the number of projects funded, 66% improvement in the number of women served, and a 139% improvement in total benefits achieved. The Fund for Women incorporated the Hybrid model in their selection process in 2012 and this paper describes the benefits achieved and the challenges with adopting this approach in a foundation context, including educating and achieving consensus amongst the selection committee and individual member’s project selection preferences that were outside of the initial model’s objective function.

Keywords: Charitable Donation Allocation; Binary Linear Programming; Goal Programming; Hybrid Selection Model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C44 C61 L31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28 pages
Date: 2012
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://graduate.lerner.udel.edu/sites/default/file ... 2012/UDWP2012-12.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://graduate.lerner.udel.edu/sites/default/files/ECON/PDFs/RePEc/dlw/WorkingPapers/2012/UDWP2012-12.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://lerner.udel.edu/sites/default/files/ECON/PDFs/RePEc/dlw/WorkingPapers/2012/UDWP2012-12.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dlw:wpaper:12-12.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Delaware, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Saul Hoffman ().