Was the NOAA Panel Correct about Contingent Valuation?
Richard Carson,
Michael Hanemann (michael.hanemann@asu.edu),
Raymond Kopp,
Jon A. Krosnick,
Robert C. Mitchell,
Stanley Presser,
Paul Ruud and
V. Smith
No 96-21, Working Papers from Duke University, Department of Economics
Abstract:
The past few years have seen a highly charged debate about whether contingent valuation (CV) surveys can provide valid economic measures of people's values for environmental resources. In an effort to appraise the validity of CV measures of economic value, a distinguished panel of social scientists, chaired by two Nobel laureates, was established by NOAA, to critically evaluate the validity of CV measures of nonuse value.
JEL-codes: D6 H4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.duke.edu/Papers/Abstracts96/abstract.96.21.html main text
Related works:
Working Paper: Was the NOAA Panel Correct about Contingent Valuation? (1996)
Working Paper: Was the NOAA Panel Correct About Contingent Valuation? (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:duk:dukeec:96-21
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Duke University, Department of Economics Department of Economics Duke University 213 Social Sciences Building Box 90097 Durham, NC 27708-0097.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Department of Economics Webmaster (webmaster@econ.duke.edu).