ASEAN Integration in 2030: United States Perspectives

Pek Koon Heng
Additional contact information
Pek Koon Heng: Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI)

Governance Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract: The paper argues that United States (US) participation in the East Asia Summit (EAS)—regional integration architecture led by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)—was motivated by four changes in the regional economic landscape : (i) the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and emergence of the ASEAN+3 grouping; (ii) the rise of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the leading regional growth engine and an active player in regional integration arrangements; (iii) the failure of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) arrangement to foster trade liberalization in the region; and (iv) the inability of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Doha Development Round to lower global trade barriers significantly. In joining the EAS, the Obama Administration espoused an approach known as divided functionality, one that would give priority to APEC, and its trade-focused Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement economic engagement with East Asia, and the EAS for addressing political and security issues. Currently, two architectures for regional economic integration are contesting. The first embodies the US vision of a deeply institutionalized Asia-Pacific economic community, as articulated by the ongoing TPP trade negotiations. The second is represented by the Asia-only ASEAN+3 framework, a shallowly institutionalized grouping with weak enforcement compliance mechanisms. However, despite differences in the two approaches, prospects for a healthy complementarity between them—through overlapping memberships, the application of open regionalism, and the benefits of competitive liberalization among specific trade agreements—seem promising.

Keywords: ASEAN integration; the East Asia Submit; The United States; regional integration architecture; Asia-Pacific economic community (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F15 F18 F55 F59 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cwa and nep-sea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/23310 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.eaber.org/node/23310 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23310 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://eaber.org/node/23310)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:govern:23310

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Governance Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong ().