A Two-Sided Matching Approach for Partner Selection and Assessing Complementarities in Partners’ Attributes in Inter-Firm Alliances
Denisa Mindruta () and
Mahka Moeen ()
No 1068, HEC Research Papers Series from HEC Paris
Abstract:
Strategic alliances are undertaken to create value through complementarities of resources and capabilities of the partner firms. The authors develop a matching framework to study strategic alliances, taking a market perspective that explicitly incorporates key features of transactions in strategic alliances: two sided decision making in voluntary collaboration; quest for complementarities between indivisible and heterogeneous partner attributes; and competition on each side for partners on the other side. They assess the relative performance of matching models and binary choice models when estimating parameters within simulations based on a known functional relationship. Within the context of research alliances in the bio-pharmaceutical industry, we hypothesize and find support using the matching model framework for complementarity in partner size, and in upstream research capabilities.
Keywords: alliances; two-sided matching; maximum score estimator; bio-pharmaceutical industry; complementarity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 52 pages
Date: 2014-11-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-com and nep-cse
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2536109 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebg:heccah:1068
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in HEC Research Papers Series from HEC Paris HEC Paris, 78351 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antoine Haldemann ().