Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers

Rodolphe Durand () and Samuel Touboul ()

No 1076, HEC Research Papers Series from HEC Paris

Abstract: Raters of firms play an important role in assessing domains ranging from sustainability to corporate governance to best places to work. Managers, investors, and scholars increasingly rely on these ratings to make strategic decisions, invest trillions of dollars in capital and study corporate social responsibility (CSR), guided by the implicit assumption that the ratings are valid. The authors document the surprising lack of agreement across social ratings from six well-established raters. These differences remain even when we adjust for explicit differences in the definition of CSR held by different raters, implying the ratings have low validity. The authors' results suggest that users of social ratings should exercise caution in interpreting their connection to actual CSR and that raters should conduct regular evaluations of their ratings.

Keywords: N/A (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2014-11-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2524861 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebg:heccah:1076

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HEC Research Papers Series from HEC Paris HEC Paris, 78351 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antoine Haldemann ().