The Globalized Myth of Ownership and Its Implications for Tax Competition
Mathias Risse and
Marco Meyer
Additional contact information
Mathias Risse: Harvard U
Marco Meyer: U of York
Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government
Abstract:
Tax competition (by states) and tax evasion (by individuals or companies) unfold at a dramatic scale. An obvious adverse effect is that some states lose their tax base. Perhaps less obviously, states lose out by setting tax policy differently--often reducing taxes--due to tax competition. Is tax competition among states morally problematic? We approach this question by identifying the globalized myth of ownership. We choose this name parallel to Liam Murphy and Thomas Nagel's myth of ownership. The globalized myth is the (false) view that one can assess a country's justifiably disposable national income simply by looking at its gross national income (or gross national income as it would be absent certain forms of tax competition). Much like its domestic counterpart, exposing that myth will have important implications across a range of domains. Here we explore specifically how tax competition in an interconnected world appears in this light, and so by drawing on the grounds-of-justice approach developed in Mathias Risse's On Global Justice.
Date: 2018-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1668
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp18-018
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series from Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().